PSYC2017 Personality and Individual Differences Research Report Sample
TASK
Your task is to write a 2000-word research report based on the study you participated in during your Week 2 tutorial. This study examined the relationship between intergroup contact, conceptualisations of racism, and willingness to take collective action in support of racial equality.
Content
The Method and Results sections of the report have been written for you already (these can be found in the Assessments folder on Canvas). Therefore, you are required to write and submit the other sections of the report. Specifically, your research report must include all of the following sections:
1. A title that provides a concise summary of your report
2. An abstract (no more than 120 words) summarising the report
3. An introduction (approximately 940 words) that includes:
a. A critical review of the relevant theoretical and empirical literature
b. A clear rationale for the study
c. A set of justified research hypotheses
4. A discussion (approximately 940 words) that includes:
a. A critical interpretation of the findings in relation to the aims and hypotheses of the study and the findings of others
b. The theoretical and practical implications of the research
c. A critical evaluation of the strengths and limitations of the research
d. Suggestions for future research
5. A reference list
Word count
The abstract, introduction, and discussion sections, including in-text citations, count towards the word count. The title and reference list do not count towards the word count. Students who exceedthe 2000-word count by more than 5% will be penalised.
Solution
Introduction
a. Critical Review
The previous assessment presents research on the dynamic relationship between interracial encounters, racist worldviews, and collective activism for racial justice. Examining these results in the context of the larger academic conversation is made possible by a critical analysis of the theoretical and empirical literature in this area. University Assignment Help, The theoretical underpinnings of the study, Intergroup Contact Theory, are consistent with previous studies. The Contact Hypothesis, proposed by Allport in 1954, states that good intergroup contact can mitigate prejudice and spur societal transformation. Consistent with this theoretical paradigm, the study found a positive main impact on contact quality, with people who reported high-quality contact being readier to engage in collective action (Schouler et al., 2021).
Theoretical backing comes from the Social Identity Theory which states that people find meaning in their participation in social groups and are more inclined to take part in collective action when they have a strong sense of solidarity with a marginalized group. The research is consistent with this theory in a roundabout way since it examines the impact of group-based perceptions of racism (systemic vs. individual) on group action. The separation of systemic racism from racism that occurs within an individual's environment is in line with current debates on the subject. A growing body of research suggests that institutionalized racism is a significant contributor to racial inequality. The study adds to the continuing discussion about the importance of systemic awareness in advancing social justice by focusing on the interplay between this conceptualization and the quality of communication between groups (Hassler et al., 2020).
The study's validity is boosted by its empirical design, which included the use of modified scales from prior studies, controls for possible manipulation, and a sizable sample size. This level of methodological consistency is consistent with standards in the field of social psychology. Self-report measures, dichotomizing contact quality, and a homogenous sample are all limitations that must be recognized. More sophisticated evaluations and wider representation in future studies are encouraged. The research sheds light on the complex dynamic between intergroup contact, racist ideology, and joint efforts to achieve racial justice.
b. Rationale
This research was inspired by the pressing call to end systemic racism and inspire a widespread movement for racial justice. Recent years have seen a rise in public awareness and discussion of racial inequality and systematic racism. The success of movements for social change depends on people understanding what drives them to join forces with others. First, the research fills a need in the existing literature by investigating the correlation between the quality of contact between different social groups and how people see racism (structural vs. personal). This study sheds light on how people's impressions of racism may affect their propensity to join forces. The study's emphasis on group efforts is also consistent with wider efforts to advance social justice and diminish racial inequities. The potential of collective action to influence policy shifts and alleviate structural inequalities makes it an important field of inquiry (Banaji, Fiske & Massey, 2021).
Finally, the study's results can be used to shape lobbying and education campaigns. Educators, activists, and policymakers can improve their efforts to raise awareness and mobilise support for racial equality if they have a better understanding of the variables that inspire individuals to take action. Overall, the study's justification resides in its ability to help in the quest of a more fair and equitable society by shedding light on the interplay of intergroup interaction, racist conceptualizations, and collective action.
c. Research Hypothesis
1st Hypothesis - Individuals' desire to take part in collective action for racial justice is correlated with their level of understanding of systematic racism. Those with a deeper comprehension of structural racism are more likely to take part in concerted efforts to combat it. This concept has its theoretical roots in Social Identity Theory, which argues that people are more inclined to take part in group action if they have a sense of belonging to a marginalized group and believe that they are working towards a common goal.
2nd Hypothesis - To what extent people feel they can make a difference moderates the relationship between awareness of structural racism and readiness to take collective action to overcome racism. People are more likely to conduct collective action if they are positive about the results of their efforts, according to the theory of collective efficacy (Mahabir et al., 2021).
3rd Hypothesis - The influence of social norms and peer support on people's readiness to participate in collective action will be tempered by people's levels of understanding about systematic racism. Those with a strong knowledge of systematic racism will benefit more from the positive effects of social norms and peer support on their desire to take part in collective action. Arguments from the Social Norms Theory and the Social Identity Theory back up the thesis.
4th Hypothesis - Individual differences in age, education, and race/ethnicity will dampen the correlation between awareness of systemic racism and group mobilization. There is a positive association between awareness of systemic racism and the willingness to take collective action, and this correlation is stronger among younger, better-educated, and members of historically disadvantaged racial/ethnic groups. Previous research has indicated that particular demographic variables may influence social cognition and engagement (Reimer et al., 2016).
Discussion
a. Critical interpretation of the findings
The major objective of the research was to investigate the connection between systemic racism knowledge, confidence in one's ability to make a difference, societal expectations, demographics, and openness to group action. Specific parts of this connection were the focus of the study's hypotheses.
The results validate Hypothesis 1, which states that understanding systemic racism increases one's desire to take part in collective action. Those who had a deeper understanding of systemic racism were more willing to take part in collective efforts to eliminate prejudice.
The second hypothesis claimed that the feeling of agency mediates the relationship between awareness of systemic racism and group mobilization. This study lends credence to this theory and highlights the importance of confidence in a group context.
The third hypothesis verifies that those who have a better grasp of structural racism are more inclined to take collective action, according to the third hypothesis, since they will have a larger pool of social norms and peer support from which to draw. The results highlight the value of social norms and peer support for those with an advanced knowledge of structural racism (Smedley, 2023).
The fourth hypothesis considers the potential effects of demographic factors on individuals' and communities' capacity to identify systemic racism and respond collectively. According to the findings, there was a more robust positive correlation between age, education level, racial/ethnic minority status, and the desire to take collective action against systematic racism.
Comparative Insights
This research adds to the literature by providing a complete analysis of the dynamics between knowledge of systemic racism, perceived effectiveness in combating racism, social norms, and demography within the context of concerted efforts to achieve racial justice. Although some of these have been the subject of prior research, this study's holistic approach allows for a more complete comprehension of the processes that motivate action in the battle against racial injustice. The results of this study provide a detailed picture of the elements that shape group efforts toward racial equity. They validate the significance of people's knowledge of systematic racism, their sense of agency, prevailing social norms, and their demographics in inspiring them to take action (Miller, O’Dea, & Saucier, 2021).
b. Theoretical and practical implications
.png)
.png)
c. Strengths and Limitations
Strengths
Social identity theory and the theory of collective efficacy serve as the theoretical underpinnings for this research. This theoretical groundwork offers a firm structure for analyzing the factors that drive and shape collective behavior. The research takes a mixed-methods approach by utilizing a large sample size, checking for possible manipulation, and modifying scales from other studies. The findings are more credible and valid because of the rigorous methodology used. The study's focus on racial disparity and efforts to promote social justice is timely and important. The results may be used right away in campaigns for social change, education, and advocacy. The study's emphasis on the interplay between systemic racism awareness and other factors is a welcome addition to the literature.
Limitations
People may lie about their genuine emotions and actions in order to appear more acceptable to others. The study is limited in its applicability to other racial or ethnic groups and communities because to its homogeneous sample. Having a more representative cross-section of the population increases the study's external validity. It is possible that the intricacies of intergroup contact experiences are oversimplified when variables, such as contact quality, are reduced to either yes or no. The effects of varied contact quality might be better understood with a more detailed examination. While manipulation checks were implemented, it is possible that they miss some of the subtleties in how different participants interpreted the definition of racism (ACLRC, 2023).
d. Future research
Collective action for racial justice is an area where further study is needed, since it may lead to new insights and better methods for bringing about social change. Some ideas are as follows:
1. Longitudinal research looks at how people's understanding of racism as a system and their desire to take part in social change change over time. This method has the potential to shed light on the ever-evolving patterns and motivations that drive activists to action.
2. Examine the relationships between race and other social identities (such as gender, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status) in order to better comprehend the ways in which each of these identities affects one's understanding of systematic racism and one's desire for collective action.
3. Important insights may be gained by looking at how different racial and ethnic groups deal with and respond to systematic racism.
4. Research the effect of internet platforms on mass mobilization, as online activism has recently risen in popularity. Analyze the impact of digital campaigns, online communities, and social media on activist participation.
5. Develop and evaluate strategies to improve understanding of and responses to systemic racism.
References
ACLRC. (2023). Forms of racism. Alberta Civil Liberties Research Centre. https://www.aclrc.com/forms-of-racism
Banaji, M. R., Fiske, S. T., & Massey, D. S. (2021). Systemic racism: Individuals and interactions, institutions and Society. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3
Hässler, T., Ulu?, Ö. M., Kappmeier, M., & Travaglino, G. A. (2020). Intergroup contact and Social Change: An integrated contact?collective action model. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12412
Mahabir, D. F., O’Campo, P., Lofters, A., Shankardass, K., Salmon, C., & Muntaner, C. (2021). Experiences of everyday racism in Toronto’s health care system: A concept mapping study. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01410-9
Miller, S. S., O’Dea, C. J., & Saucier, D. A. (2021). “I can’t breathe”: Lay Conceptualizations of racism predict support for black lives matter. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110625
Otieno, O. C., Liyayla, S., & Odongo, B. C. (2015). Theoretical and practical implications of applying theory of reasoned action in an information systems study. OALib, 02(12), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102054
Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Neji, S., Rychlowska, M., Schmid, K., & Hewstone, M. (2016). Intergroup contact and Social Change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478
Scheepers, D., & Ellemers, N. (2019). Social Identity theory. Social Psychology in Action, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_9
Schouler-Ocak, M., Bhugra, D., Kastrup, M. C., Dom, G., Heinz, A., Küey, L., & Gorwood, P. (2021). Racism and mental health and the role of Mental Health Professionals. European Psychiatry, 64(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.2216
Smedley, A. (2023). Racism. Encyclopaedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/racism
Fill the form to continue reading
Would you like to schedule a callback?
Send us a message and we will get back to you
Highlights
Earn While You Learn With Us
Confidentiality Agreement
Money Back Guarantee
Live Expert Sessions
550+ Ph.D Experts
21 Step Quality Check
100% Quality
24*7 Live Help
On Time Delivery
Plagiarism-Free
81 Isla Avenue Glenroy, Mel, VIC, 3046 AU
