
LB5234 Leading and Managing Organizational Change Report 2 Sample
Assignment Brief
Learning outcomes
• Synthesise contemporary change concepts, theories, models and change framework(s) within a leadership framework.
• Evaluate contemporary change and leadership approaches, and their application to contemporary organisations and industries, in a range of contexts.
• Critically reflect on, and plan for, new directions in change and change leadership to reflect future directions and challenges to build organisational resilience.
• Demonstrate a capacity for personal reflection and self-development in relation to professional approaches to theoretical and practical change contexts.
The aim of this assessment is to analyse an organisation from a change leadership perspective and develop an Organisational Change Leadership Plan (OCLP)..
Submission Type: Analysis and Researched Consultancy Report. Can be either a written response or a multi-media equivalent of a MAXIMUM of 10 minutes. The choice is yours. Note, to produce a multi- media presentation, a written document will need to be produced which will form the basis of the multi- media presentation. This document is to be submitted together with the multi-media presentation.
Solution
1. Introduction
Tesla, Inc. has embraced its “transition” towards sustainable energy in the volatile landscape of the “automotive” and “energy” sectors. Tesla, Inc. has “revolutionized” the automotive industry with its electric vehicles (Nogueira, Sousa & Alves, 2022). This organization has expanded its influence into “energy storage” and “solar energy solutions” over the period. Referring to the information stated in the official website of Tesla, Inc., the mission statement of the company is "to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy" (tesla, 2024). This statement has emphasized on Tesla’s commitment to “innovation” and “environmental sustainability”. The company has achieved significant milestones. Tesla, Inc. has launched the first “premium all-electric sedan” (tesla, 2024). Along with the launch of Model S, Tesla, Inc. has contributed to the development of “advanced battery technology”.
In this relevance, it is significant to state that Tesla, Inc. has also been experiencing “several challenges”. The same has instigated overall essentiality of developing “effective change leadership” (Waddell et al. 2020). As per the information available at secondary sources, Tesla, Inc. has experienced challenges in “scaling production” to meet global demand (Sanguesa et al. 2021). In addition, Tesla, Inc. has faced difficulties in maintaining its “competitive edge’ in the evolving EV business landscapes (Wellings Greenwood & Coles, 2021). Apart from that, Tesla, Inc. has experienced issues in addressing organizational and cultural issues within its organizational eco-system. Relating to this context, the dynamic nature of the automotive industry sector and the organizational goals of Tesla require a well-defined “Organizational Change Leadership Plan (OCLP)”. The same will enable this organization to effectively deal with the “complexities of growth”. This strategic practice will also contribute to “innovation” while ensuring “organizational adaptability” (Senior, 2020).
This report aims to analyze Tesla, Inc. from a “change leadership perspective”. The comprehensive analysis of this paper will identify key “organizational change issues”. Referring to the in-depth analysis, a well-defined OCLP will be proposed. Even, this report will provide actionable recommendations to enable Tesla, Inc. to sustain its “competitive advantage”. The same will contribute to develop a positive organizational culture over the period. Eventually, it will enable Tesla, Inc. to achieve its strategic objectives effectively. In a nutshell, this report will offer a strategic design for effective “change management” of Tesla, Inc. through a detailed analysis of its current organizational state. It is expected that proper implementation of the effective “recommendations” regarding “change challenges” will lead Tesla, Inc. in continuing its “transition” to “sustainable energy”.
2. Description of the Organization
Tesla, Inc. is headquartered in Palo Alto, California (tesla, 2024). Referring to the information stated in this paper, Tesla, Inc. is a “globally recognized leader” in the domains of “electric vehicles (EVs)”, “energy storage”, and “solar energy solutions” (tesla, 2024). This company designs, manufactures and sells “high-performance electric vehicles” (tesla, 2024). “Model 3”, “Model S”, “Model X” and “Model Y” are some of the “revolutionized” EV launches by Tesla, Inc (tesla, 2024). In addition, Tesla, Inc. deals with “energy products” like the “Powerpack”, “Powerwall” and “Solar Roof” (tesla, 2024). The innovative business approach of Tesla, Inc. has combined “advanced innovative technology” with a commitment to “sustainability” (tesla, 2024). This initiative is aimed at reducing “over-dependency” on the “fossil fuels” (Nogueira, Sousa & Alves, 2022). As a result, this initiative can contribute to mitigating “climate change” to a great extent for university assignment help.
The business operational activities of Tesla, Inc. are generally operated under the leadership of CEO Elon Musk (tesla, 2024). His leadership has enabled Tesla, Inc. to shape the “traditional automotive industry”. The advanced innovative EV launches of Tesla, Inc. have proved that electric vehicles can be both “high-performing” and “environmentally friendly” (Wellings, Greenwood & Coles, 2021). In this relevance, it is significant to state that the “Gigafactories” of Tesla, Inc. are located in various parts of the world (tesla, 2024). The methods applied in “Gigafactories” integrate “advanced manufacturing techniques” and “renewable energy sources” (Sanguesa et al. 2021). Precisely, the operational activities of “Gigafactories” are aligned with the organizational mission of Tesla, Inc. Such initiatives focus on promoting “sustainable energy”.
The current business model of Tesla, Inc. supports manufacturing of the Electric Vehicles. In addition, it also covers a holistic “energy ecosystem”. It is relevant to state in this context that the “energy division” of Tesla, Inc. focuses on developing “renewable energy solutions” for businesses, homes and utilities (Costa et al. 2022). Tesla offers its consumers a “sustainable alternative” to traditional energy sources by integrating “solar energy generation” with “energy storage”. It has already been indicated in this paper that Tesla has been facing significant organizational challenges. The “revolutionary” technological advancements have thoroughly shaped innovation process nowadays (Benzidia, Luca & Boiko, 2021). The same has put pressure on the estimated “production capabilities” and “supply chain management” of Tesla. Relating to this information, it can be derived that the “high-profile leadership” of Tesla, Inc. has raised concerns about “employee satisfaction” (Alanazi, 2023).
The “intense work culture” has led to questions about its organizational culture. These issues need to be addressed properly. This is the reason why the role of “effective change leadership” is highly significant. This will enable Tesla, Inc. to maintain its “market position” in the “competitive business landscape”. Eventually, this practice will contribute to achieving “long-term success” for this organization in the coming days.
3. Organizational Change Issues in Tesla, Inc
This report will shed light on the “organizational change issues” in Tesla, Inc. In addition, this paper will provide a “structured approach” to manage these changes within Tesla.
a. Organizational Culture and Employee Satisfaction
• High-Pressure Work Environment
Tesla, Inc. is known for its “high-pressure work environment”. It is driven by its “organizational mission” and the “expectations” monitored by its leadership. In a nutshell, this work culture promotes “innovation” and “quick-responsive problem-solving” (Azeem et al. 2021). On the other hand, it can also lead to high “turnover rates” and “employee burnout”. Precisely, certain issues have been identified in maintaining balance between “employee well-being” and the “demand for high performance”.
Figure 1: Potential challenges that may instigate organizational change
(Source: Walk, 2023).
b. Leadership Style and Communication
• Internal communication issues due to current leadership practice
The leadership style adopted by Elon Musk reflects his “bold vision” relating to “sustainable growth” of this organization. Elon Musk promotes “direct communication”. This approach has instigated both “strengths” and “challenges” for Tesla, Inc. The “effective leadership practice” of Elon Musk has inspired Tesla, Inc. to achieve significant achievements. On the other hand, it has also led to “public controversies”. Based on the information available at secondary sources, the same has caused “internal communication challenges” (Walk, 2023).
c. Production and Supply Chain Challenges
• Supply Chain Disruptions
The current supply chain management of Tesla, Inc. is “multi-layered” and “complex”. This is the reason why any ‘disruption” in the supply chain can interrupt “production activities”. As a result, the same will affect “delivery timelines”. In recent times, global supply chain “disruptions” has been identified in the context of “semiconductor availability” (Tse et al. 2024). The same have highlighted the “vulnerability of the production processes” in Tesla, Inc.
• Scaling Production
The company has encountered challenges in its “multi-layered production processes” (Lebrouhi et al. 2021). The same has led to “delays” and “quality control issues”. It has become a significant challenge to “scale production” while maintaining “high standards” of quality and efficiency.
d. Regulatory and Compliance Issues
• Environmental and Ethical Concerns
The analysis depicted in this paper has unveiled that the organizational mission of Tesla, Inc. is aligned with its sustainability initiatives. Still, this organization is experiencing issues in initiating the “environmental” and “ethical” practices. According to the information available at reliable sources, Tesla, Inc is experiencing challenges in “sourcing of raw materials” and “battery disposal” (Stefanoni & Voltes-Dorta, 2021). The same has also instigated the brand reputation of Tesla, Inc. to some extent.
e. Market Competition and Technological Advancements
• Technological Integration
It has already been stated that Tesla, Inc. has adopted “strategic initiatives” to expand its “product line” (tesla, 2024). The “integration” of advanced technologies into its “existing offerings” is a “complex task”. Such integration need to be “safe” and “user-friendly”. In addition, the “integration process” must be followed by proper “testing” and “continuous improvement” over the period.
• Increasing Competition
A “growing competition” has been identified in the EV market nowadays (Jones, Elliott & Nguyen-Tien, 2020). Precisely, the EV domain has become increasingly “competitive”. Referring to the information available at reliable sources, the “new entrants” have started significantly investing in “EV technology”. Relating to this context, Tesla, Inc. needs to continuously innovate in order to maintain its “market share” and “competitive edge”.
4. Relevance, Applicability & Implication of Researches in addressing change challenges
a. Organizational Culture and Leadership
i. Transformational Leadership organizational performance
Transformational leadership focuses on “inspiring” and “motivating” employees to achieve their full potential (Razzaq, Sami & Hammad, 2020). Effective application of “transformational leadership” has been identified in the context of shaping “” of Tesla, Inc.
Figure 2: Role of Transformational Leadership in shaping organizational change
(Source: Vinh, Hien & Do, 2022).
It is relevant to state that the “leadership approach” of Elon Musk is aligned with transformational principles. In addition, Elon Musk’s leadership approach is highly influenced by various “transactional elements” including “performance monitoring”, “rewards” etc. These elements are aimed at enhancing “employee satisfaction” and “organizational performance” over the period (Vinh, Hien & Do, 2022).
b. Change Management Theories and Models
i. Lewin’s Change Management Model
The “Change Management Model” proposed by “Kurt Lewin” involves the stages of “unfreezing”, “changing” and “refreezing” (Mtongana & Musundire, 2020). It has emphasized on the importance of preparing an organization for change. In addition, Lewin’s Change Management Model has prioritized “change implementation” in order to “strengthen” new practices.
Figure 3: Lewin’s Change Management Model in addressing change challenges
(Source: Burnes, 2020).
Effective implementation of this model can guide Tesla, Inc. throughout the process of integrating new technologies. Even, Lewin’s Change Management Model can help Tesla to deal with the “market competition” is a strategic manner. This model ensures that changes are thoroughly “planned” and “executed” (Burnes, 2020). It is relevant to state that the changes are duly aligned with the organizational culture of Tesla, Inc.
ii. Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model
The “8-Step Change Model” by John Kotter has provided a “structured approach” (McIntosh et al. 2023). The same can be applied to implement “necessary changes” in organizations as also relevant in the context of Tesla, Inc.
Figure 4: Steps involved in Kotter’s 8-step model
(Source: Weiss & Li, 2020).
“Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model” includes “creating a sense of urgency”, “developing a powerful coalition”, “building a vision and strategy” (Weiss & Li, 2020). In addition, the “8-Step Change Model” by John Kotter focuses on “communicating the change vision”, “generating short-term wins”. Apart from that, this model emphasizes on “removing obstacles”, “consolidating gains” and “introducing new approaches” in the organizational culture. Referring to this information, proper implementation of this model can enable Tesla, Inc. to address its “change challenges” effectively.
c. Employee Well-being and Performance
i. Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model
According to the key concept of “JD-R Model”, “job demands” and “job resources” influence employee performance and employee well-being to a great extent (Radic et al. 2020). The term “job demands” refer to time pressure, workload etc. In addition, the term “job resources” refer to “support”. Effective application of this model can enable Tesla, Inc. to identify the factors that may potentially contribute to “employee burnout”. Even, “JD-R Model” can help Tesla to develop “employee-friendly strategies” by emphasizing on the “career development opportunities”.
d. Innovation and Technology Management
i. Technology Adoption Models
The “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)” and “Diffusion of Innovations (DOI)” theory can provide “valuable insights” into how advanced technologies are adopted by the users. These models can help Tesla, Inc. to understand and enhance “customer acceptance” of its advanced features (Chen et al. 2023). It is significant to state that “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)” focuses on “perceived usefulness” and “communication strategies” (Bousonville et al. 2022).
ii. Disruptive Innovation Theory
Referring to the key concept of “Disruptive Innovation Theory”, adoption of “new technologies” can disrupt the “existing markets” (Habib et al. 2020). The initiatives adopted by Tesla, Inc. towards “electric vehicles” and “renewable energy solutions” reflect “disruptive innovation” (Jobaid & Naher, 2020). Even, Tesla, Inc. must continue to innovate and adapt to emerging trends & technologies. This approach will enable Tesla to gain competitive advantage over its contemporaries to some extent.
5. Various aspects of Organizational Change Leadership Plan (OCLP) for Tesla, Inc.
a. Vision and Strategy for Change
Vision Statement
Tesla’s vision is to create an “innovative”, “sustainable” company that leads the “global transition” to “renewable energy” (tesla, 2024).
Strategic Objectives
• Promote Employee Well-being
Create a “supportive work environment” that can balance “high performance” with “employee well-being”.
• Enhance Production Efficiency
Optimize “production processes” and improve “supply chain efficiency” to meet growing demand.
• Ensure Ethical and Environmental Responsibility
Initiatives to ensure the highest standards of “ethical practices” and “sustainability” in all operations
• Drive Continuous Innovation
Invest in “research and development” in order to stay ahead of technological advancements. This practice will also enable Tesla, Inc. to stay ahead of the “market competition”.
b. Change Leadership Framework
• Developing and Communicating the Change Vision
The leadership practiced in Tesla must focuses on developing an “inspiring vision” for the future. The same can be attained by outlining the “strategic objectives” and the “benefits of the proposed changes”. This vision must be communicated consistently through various channels including “digital platforms”, “internal newsletters” etc (Flaig, Kindström & Ottosson, 2021). Relating to this information, “transparency” is essential to develop “trust” and “commitment” among the employees.
• Creating a Sense of Urgency
Tesla’s leadership must communicate the identified “challenges” in order to “initiate change”. The same must emphasize on “employee burnout”, “production delays” and “loss of competitive advantage” (Schweitzer, Malek & Sarin, 2023).
c. Implementation of the Change Initiatives
The change initiatives must strengthen the following aspects as enlisted below;
i. Enhancing Production Efficiency
• Advanced Technologies
Invest in “advanced manufacturing technologies” such as “robotics”, “automation” and “predictive analytics” can enhance production capabilities.
• Lean Manufacturing
Implementation of “lean manufacturing principles” can optimize “processes”, eliminate “waste” and improve “production efficiency” (Lee et al. 2023).
• Supply Chain Diversification
Development of a “diversified supply chain strategy” can mitigate potential risks.
ii. Promoting Employee Well-being
• Work-life Balance
The “work-life balance” can be promoted by encouraging “flexible work arrangements” such as “flexible hours”, “remote work facility” etc. (Ritala, Albareda & Bocken, 2021).
• Wellness Programs
It is highly significant to introduce “wellness programs” that address mental, physical and emotional health of the employees.
• Recognition and Rewards
Implementation of a well-designed “recognition and rewards program” can acknowledge outstanding performance and employee contributions.
iii. Driving Continuous Innovation
• Innovation Labs
Setting innovation labs within Tesla can optimize “experimentation” and “prototyping” (Schiefer et al. 2024).
• R&D Investment
It is significant to increase investment in “research and development” initiatives. The same will enable to explore “new technologies” and improve “existing products”.
• Customer Feedback
It is essential to engage with the customers through focus groups, surveys, social media etc. The same will provide valuable insights into “consumer needs” and their preferences.
d. Ensuring Regulatory Compliance
• Regulatory Engagement
It is highly strategic to engage with the “regulatory authorities” and “policymakers”. The same will enable Tesla to stay informed about changes in “regulations and standards”.
• Compliance Management Systems
Development and effective implementation of “compliance management systems” is necessary (Ballingall, Sarvi & Sweatman, 2023). The same will enable to monitor the “regulatory requirements” regularly.
• Sustainability Reporting
“Sustainability Reporting” can enhance transparency by publishing regular sustainability reports. These reports must emphasize on the details of Tesla’s “ethical” and “environmental” practices.
e. Optimizing Ethical and Environmental Responsibility
• Environmental Impact Reduction
Implementation of effective measures is required. The same will enable to reduce the “environmental impact” of Tesla’s operations.
• Responsible Sourcing
It is essential to ensure that the “raw materials” are sourced with a focus on “environmental sustainability” and “ethical practices” (Chen, 2022).
• Stakeholder Engagement
Regular “communication” and “collaboration” can enhance “stakeholder relationships”. The same can drive “collective action” towards shared goals of Tesla, Inc.
6. Recommendations
These “actionable recommendations” will enable to reflect on the identified change issues.
a. Promoting Employee Well-being
• Encourage Work-life Balance
Promoting “work-life balance” is highly significant for “employee well-being”. Tesla must offer “flexible work arrangements” to help its employees in managing their personal and professional lives effectively (Neubert & Montañez, 2020).
• Introduce Comprehensive Wellness Programs
As initially indicated, Tesla must introduce “wellness programs” that address physical, mental, and emotional health of the employees. The same includes conducting stress management workshops and offering mental health support services.
b. Enhancing Production Efficiency
• Invest in Advanced Manufacturing Technologies
Tesla must invest in “advanced manufacturing technologies” in order to “scale” production effectively. These technologies focus on maximizing “production capabilities”, reduce “errors” and increase overall “operational efficiency”.
• Adopt Lean Manufacturing Principles
Implementation of “lean manufacturing techniques” can help Tesla to shape its production processes to a great extent (Cochran & Rauch, 2020).
c. Ensuring Regulatory Compliance
• Engage with Regulatory Authorities
Active participation in “industry forums” can influence “regulatory developments”.
• Develop well-defined Compliance Management Systems
A well-designed “compliance management systems” must be implemented. The “compliance management systems” must conduct “regular audits”, perform “risk assessments” and provide “employee training” on compliance standards (Lim et al. 2021).
d. Driving Continuous Innovation
• Establish Innovation Labs
It is essential to establish “Innovation Labs”. These labs can help in developing “new ideas” and “technologies” (Schiefer et al. 2024). The same will contribute to promoting a “culture of innovation” and “continuous improvement”.
• Increase R&D Investment
Tesla must increase “investment” in research and development in order to maintain its “competitive edge”.
e. Ensuring Ethical and Environmental Responsibility
• Reduce Environmental Impact
Implementation of effective measures is required. The same will improve “energy efficiency”, reduce “waste” and increase the “use of renewable energy sources” across all operations of Tesla, Inc.
• Ensure Responsible Sourcing
Tesla, Inc. must prioritize “responsible sourcing” of the raw materials (Chen, 2022). Precisely, this organization must focus on “ethical practices” and “environmental sustainability”.
7. Conclusion
In accordance with the information stated in this report, Tesla, Inc. has encountered significant challenges. The same has instigated the requirement of a well-defined “effective change leadership plan”. This report has thoroughly analyzed Tesla, Inc. from a “change leadership perspective”. Particularly, this paper has identified the key “organizational change issues” of Tesla. Referring to those changes, a detailed “Organizational Change Leadership Plan (OCLP)” has been proposed. As stated, the analysis has highlighted several “critical challenges” including “production and supply chain issues”, “organizational culture and employee satisfaction”, “market competition and technological advancements” and “regulatory and compliance concerns”. The proposed OCLP has outlined strategic objectives. In addition, this paper has also developed effective initiatives to attain those objectives.
Referring to the analysis depicted in this report, implementation of strategic initiatives requires a “collaborative effort” across all levels of Tesla. Even, the implementation of the initiatives must focus on “employee engagement”, “continuous improvement” and “stakeholder involvement”. In a nutshell, this report has provided “actionable steps” to address the identified “change issues”. Last but not least; the success of Tesla's change initiatives emphasizes on several factors including employee well-being, stakeholders’ expectations, market demand etc. Referring to the exhaustive analysis attained in this paper, Tesla can continue to lead the industry. Eventually, the same will enable Tesla, Inc. to make a positive impact in the coming days.
8. Reference list
Alanazi, F. (2023). Electric vehicles: benefits, challenges, and potential solutions for widespread adaptation. Applied Sciences, 13(10), 6016. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106016 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Azeem, M., Ahmed, M., Haider, S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, 101635. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101635 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Ballingall, S., Sarvi, M., & Sweatman, P. (2023). Standards relevant to automated driving system safety: a systematic assessment. Transportation Engineering, 13, 100202. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.100202 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Benzidia, S., Luca, R. M., & Boiko, S. (2021). Disruptive innovation, business models, and encroachment strategies: Buyer's perspective on electric and hybrid vehicle technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 165, 120520. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120520 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Bousonville, T., Rösler, I., Vogt, J., & Wolniak, N. (2022). Performance and acceptance of a partially automated shuttle service for commuters using a Tesla Model X. Transportation Research Procedia, 64, 98-106. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.09.013 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Burnes, B. (2020). The origins of Lewin’s three-step model of change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32-59. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863198926 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Chen, J. Y. (2022). Responsible sourcing and supply chain traceability. International Journal of Production Economics, 248, 108462. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108462 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Chen, Y., Khan, S. K., Shiwakoti, N., Stasinopoulos, P., & Aghabayk, K. (2023). Analysis of Australian public acceptance of fully automated vehicles by extending technology acceptance model. Case studies on transport policy, 14, 101072. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101072 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Cochran, D. S., & Rauch, E. (2020). Sustainable enterprise design 4.0: Addressing industry 4.0 technologies from the perspective of sustainability. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1237-1244. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.173 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Costa, E., Wells, P., Wang, L., & Costa, G. (2022). The electric vehicle and renewable energy: Changes in boundary conditions that enhance business model innovations. Journal of cleaner production, 333, 130034. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130034 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Flaig, A., Kindström, D., & Ottosson, M. (2021). Market-shaping strategies: A conceptual framework for generating market outcomes. Industrial Marketing Management, 96, 254-266. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2021.06.004 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Habib, T., Kristiansen, J. N., Rana, M. B., & Ritala, P. (2020). Revisiting the role of modular innovation in technological radicalness and architectural change of products: The case of Tesla X and Roomba. Technovation, 98, 102163. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102163 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Jobaid, M. I., & Naher, K. (2020). Tesla's relationship building disruptive technology in automobile industry in India. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 16(1), 142-153. Retrieved from: DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21172/1.171.21 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Jones, B., Elliott, R. J., & Nguyen-Tien, V. (2020). The EV revolution: The road ahead for critical raw materials demand. Applied Energy, 280, 115072. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115072 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Lebrouhi, B. E., Khattari, Y., Lamrani, B., Maaroufi, M., Zeraouli, Y., & Kousksou, T. (2021). Key challenges for a large-scale development of battery electric vehicles: A comprehensive review. Journal of Energy Storage, 44, 103273. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103273 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Lee, J., Chua, P. C., Chen, L., Ng, P. H. N., Kim, Y., Wu, Q., ... & Moon, S. K. (2023). Key enabling technologies for smart factory in automotive industry: status and applications. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Smart Technology, 1(1), 93-105. Retrieved from: DOI: https://doi.org/10.57062/ijpem-st.2022.0017 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Lim, K. L., Whitehead, J., Jia, D., & Zheng, Z. (2021). State of data platforms for connected vehicles and infrastructures. Communications in transportation research, 1, 100013. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commtr.2021.100013 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
McIntosh, M. S., Garvan, C., Kalynych, C. J., Fallucco, E. M., Ventura, A. B., & Chesire, D. J. (2023). Champ: a model for building a center to support health care worker well-being after experiencing an adverse event. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 49(4), 207-212. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.01.008 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Mtongana, B., & Musundire, A. (2020). Exploring the Relationship between Culture Change, Kurt Lewin? s Model of Change, Employee Behaviour and Employee Performance in South African State owned Enterprises: The Case of Transnet Property Division. International Journal of Science and Research, 9(7), 1020-1032. Retrieved from: DOI: 10.21275/SR20608110003 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Neubert, M. J., & Montañez, G. D. (2020). Virtue as a framework for the design and use of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 63(2), 195-204. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2019.11.001 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Nogueira, T., Sousa, E., & Alves, G. R. (2022). Electric vehicles growth until 2030: Impact on the distribution network power. Energy Reports, 8, 145-152. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.106 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Radic, A., Arjona-Fuentes, J. M., Ariza-Montes, A., Han, H., & Law, R. (2020). Job demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102518. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102518 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Razzaq, S., Sami, A., & Hammad, M. (2020). Transformational leadership and organizational performance in Western & non-Western context: Systematic review of 2019. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Research, 3(3), 58-60. Retrieved from: Doi: 10.31580/ijer.v3i3.1505 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Ritala, P., Albareda, L., & Bocken, N. (2021). Value creation and appropriation in economic, social, and environmental domains: Recognizing and resolving the institutionalized asymmetries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 290, 125796. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125796 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Sanguesa, J. A., Torres-Sanz, V., Garrido, P., Martinez, F. J., & Marquez-Barja, J. M. (2021). A review on electric vehicles: Technologies and challenges. Smart Cities, 4(1), 372-404. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010022 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Schiefer, T., Mahr, D., van Fenema, P. C., & Mennens, K. (2024). A collaborative approach to manage continuous service innovation. Technovation, 134, 103029. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103029 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Schweitzer, F., Malek, S. L., & Sarin, S. (2023). Exploring the future of market driving: A dialogue with marketing thought leaders. Industrial Marketing Management, 113, 277-294. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.06.010 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Senior (2020) Organizational Change, 7h edn, Pearson
Stefanoni, S., & Voltes-Dorta, A. (2021). Technical efficiency of car manufacturers under environmental and sustainability pressures: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 311, 127589. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127589 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
tesla,(2024).Model 3 $7,500 Federal Tax Credit Available From $29,990 After Est. Savings. Retrieved from: https://www.tesla.com/ [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Tse, Y. K., Dong, K., Sun, R., & Mason, R. (2024). Recovering from geopolitical risk: An event study of Huawei’s semiconductor supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 109347. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109347 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]
Vinh, N. Q., Hien, L. M., & Do, Q. H. (2022). The relationship between transformation leadership, job satisfaction and employee motivation in the tourism industry. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 161. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040161 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Waddell, et al, (2020) Organisational Change Development & Transformation, 6th edn, Pearson.
Walk, M. (2023). Leaders as change executors: The impact of leader attitudes to change and change-specific support on followers. European Management Journal, 41(1), 154-163. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.01.002 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Weiss, P. G., & Li, S. T. T. (2020). Leading change to address the needs and well-being of trainees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Academic pediatrics, 20(6), 735-741. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2020.06.001 [Retrieved on 23 July 2024]
Wellings, J., Greenwood, D., & Coles, S. R. (2021). Understanding the future impacts of electric vehicles—An analysis of multiple factors that influence the market. Vehicles, 3(4), 851-871. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles3040051 [Retrieved on 24 July 2024]