CM801 Introduction to Risk Analysis Report 2 Sample

Still, Looking for CM801 Introduction to Risk Analysis Report 2 Sample? You’ve reached The Right Place!

Order Now

CM801 Introduction to Risk Analysis Report 2 Sample

Instructions:

1. Select Two Countries: Choose two countries from the World Bank;s list of countries (make sure to specify the country income level (Low-middle-high income country)

2. Select Two SDG Indicators: Choose two SDG indicators (e.g., Maternal Mortality Ratio, Access to Clean Water, etc.) for analysis. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/dataportal

1. Conduct Research: Research and fill out the table below comparing the selected indicators between the two countries.

2. Write a Discussion: Based on your analysis, write a brief discussion (no more than 500 words) comparing the two countries. Discuss potential factors contributing to the differences and similarities observed.

Discussion:

• Compare and contrast the selected SDG indicators for the two countries.

• Consider factors such as economic status, health policies, infrastructure, and cultural differences.

• Reflect on how these factors may influence the progress toward achieving the SDGs in each country.

• Suggest two potential strategies for improvement in the country with lower performance on the selected indicators (bullet points).

Solution

Countries:

Country 1: Norway (High-Income Country)

Country 2: Nigeria (Low-Income Country)

SDG Indicators:

Indicator 1: Maternal Mortality Ratio

Indicator 2: Access to Clean Water

Table: Comparative Analysis of SDG Indicators

Discussion

Comparative Analysis

While Norway belongs to the group of high-income countries, Nigeria – being a low-income country – shows much worse results regarding maternal mortality and availability of clean water. The maternal mortality ratio is very low in Norway, which shows strong healthcare policies and policies, and high-quality maternal care (Diguisto et al., 2022). On the other hand, maternal mortality remains high in Nigeria, especially because of early access to health care services and skilled birth attendants and socio-economic factors (Ajegbile, 2023).

In the case for university assignment help of clean water access, Norway is well-equipped with universal coverage and has the necessary infrastructure and governance to support it. Nigeria, however, has a low access rate of only 61% of its population being able to access clean water (Isukuru et al., 2024). This may be due to inadequate infrastructure, economic challenges, and unfavorable conditions such as pollution and scarcity of water, which slows down efforts toward enhancing water availability in Nigeria.

In conclusion, the difference between the two countries demonstrates that the economic status, infrastructure, and effective governance are crucial determinants of health and water supply in the population, the need to develop the strategies to tackle the challenges in the developing countries like Nigeria.

Contributing Factors

• Economic Status: Norway is in a position to expend a great deal of money on healthcare and provision of structures while Nigeria is in a position to do very little in this direction (Ajegbile, 2023).

• Health Policies: While Norway enjoys good health policies that guarantee citizens’ right to quality health care, Nigeria struggles with policy execution issues, including corruption and inadequate funding (Shehu and Nazim, 2022).

• Infrastructure: Norway has the best infrastructure that provides access to clean water and water treatment to everyone while the situation in Nigeria is different because the infrastructure is not well developed and water treatment facilities are not adequately maintained.

• Cultural Differences: There are also cultural factors that are involved, more especially with regards to maternal health, whereby in Nigeria for instance, cultural practices may at times act as a barrier to the use of modern health facilities.

Strategies for Improvement

• Strengthen Healthcare Systems: For maternal health improvement in Nigeria, it is necessary to enhance the institution through investing in infrastructures, training more professional skilled birth attendants, and increasing the coverage of maternal health services especially in the rural areas (Diguisto et al., 2022). These measures would help reduce the high rate of maternal mortality by ensuring that more women get the right care during pregnancy and child birth.

• Enhance Water Supply Infrastructure: There is an opportunity to continue developing and strengthening the existing infrastructure and water policies to ensure clean water supply. This would assist in filling the current gap where only 61% of the total population has access to safe water (Shehu and Nazim, 2022). If these critical areas are addressed, Nigeria will be on the right track in the reduction of maternal mortality and better health through access to clean water.

References

Ajegbile, M.L. (2023). Closing the gap in maternal health access and quality through targeted investments in low-resource settings. Journal of Global Health Reports, [online] 7, p.e2023070. doi:https://doi.org/10.29392/001c.88917.

Aynalem, B.Y., Melesse, M.F. and Bitewa, Y.B. (2023). Cultural Beliefs and Traditional Practices During Pregnancy, Child Birth, and the Postpartum Period in East Gojjam Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study. Women’s Health Reports, [online] 4(1), pp.415–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0024.

Diguisto, C., Saucedo, M., Kallianidis, A., Bloemenkamp, K., Bødker, B., Buoncristiano, M., Donati, S., Gissler, M., Johansen, M., Knight, M., Korbel, M., Kristufkova,
A., Nyflot, L.T. and Deneux-Tharaux, C. (2022). Maternal mortality in eight European countries with enhanced surveillance systems: descriptive population based study. BMJ, [online] 379, p.e070621. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070621.

Isukuru, E.J., Opha, J.O., Isaiah, O.W., Orovwighose, B. and Emmanuel, S.S. (2024). Nigeria’s water crisis: Abundant water, polluted reality. Cleaner Water, [online] 2, p.100026. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwat.2024.100026.

Shehu, B. and Nazim, F. (2022). Clean Water and Sanitation for All: Study on SDGs 6.1 and 6.2 Targets with State Policies and Interventions in Nigeria. The 9th International Conference on Sustainable Development, 15(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022015071.

Fill the form to continue reading
Would you like to schedule a callback?
Send us a message and we will get back to you

Main Services

Highlights

Earn While You Learn With Us
Confidentiality Agreement
Money Back Guarantee
Live Expert Sessions
550+ Ph.D Experts
21 Step Quality Check
100% Quality
24*7 Live Help
On Time Delivery
Plagiarism-Free

Our Samples

Get Instant Help
University Assignment Help

Still Finding University Assignment Help? You’ve Come To The Right Place!


CAPTCHA
AU ADDRESS
81 Isla Avenue Glenroy, Mel, VIC, 3046 AU
CONTACT
+61 493416265
EMAIL
support@uniassignmenthelp.net